Study evaluates effects of city sprawl
Washington, DC, Oct. 18 (ENS) Sprawling
metropolitan areas have higher traffic fatality rates, more
traffic, and poorer air quality than less sprawling areas, a
new study demonstrates.
The report, Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact,
is based on a three year research project conducted by professors
at Rutgers and Cornell universities.
Unlike previous studies, which attempted to evaluate
sprawl based on one or two statistics such as density, Measuring
Sprawl uses 22 variables to rate metro areas on four different
aspects of their development. The scores for each factor indicate
how badly those regions have sprawled in terms of spreading
out housing and population; segregating homes from the activities
of daily life; lacking the focus of strong economic and social
centers; and building poorly connected street networks.
The study breaks new ground by going beyond the
index to demonstrate how sprawl development patterns affect
the way people live.
For the first time we are able to define
sprawl objectively so we can see how it measures up, said
Don Chen, executive director of the coalition Smart Growth America.
What this study tells us is that sprawl has a direct and
negative impact on our everyday lives.
Among the reports findings:
- More driving: The daily distance driven per person is over
10 miles more in the most sprawling places than in the least
sprawling, adding up to 40 more miles of automobile travel
each day for a family of four.
- More traffic deaths: The 10 most sprawling places average
36 traffic deaths for every 100,000 people, while the least
sprawling average 23 deaths per 100,000.
- More air pollution: Ozone pollution levels are as much as
41 parts per billion higher in the most sprawling areas, which
can mean the difference between safe, code green
air quality and code red air quality.
In addition, the research found sprawl to lack even the one
benefit defenders most often attribute to it: lower congestion.
People in sprawling areas endure no less traffic related delay
than those in more compact places, but have fewer alternatives
in travel routes and modes, the study found.
The report ranks 83 metropolitan areas, accounting for almost
half the countrys population, and finds that Riverside-San
Bernardino California is the most sprawling overall. It is followed
by Greensboro and Raleigh, both in North Carolina; Atlanta,
Georgia; Greenville, South Carolina; and West Palm Beach, Florida.
The most sprawling metropolitan area in terms of low density
housing is Knoxville, Tennessee; the place with the poorest
mix of homes, jobs, and shops is Raleigh; the place with the
weakest centers of activities such as town centers is Vallejo-Fairfield-Napa,
California, and the place with the most poorly connected street
network is Rochester, New York.
This research reaffirms that strengthening existing cities
and inner suburbs with new and more compact growth, and improving
the mix of homes, jobs and daily activities, are among the best
ways to counter uncontrolled sprawl and improve environmental
quality, noted Lee Epstein, director of the Lands Program
for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.
The full report is available at: <http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org>
ENVIRONMENT BRIEFS
New Zealand
plans carbon tax to meet Kyoto targets
New Zealand announced plans Oct. 17 for a carbon
tax that will push up fuel costs but help the country meet targets
under the Kyoto climate change agreement.
The tax of up to NZ$25 (US$12) per ton of carbon
dioxide equivalent will be levied sometime after 2007, and only
if the controversial Kyoto protocol comes into force internationally.
It would raise retail gas prices by up to six percent, and natural
gas and electricity prices by eight to nine percent, government
papers showed.
Big losers would be coal users, whose costs would
jump 19 percent.
An as-yet unknown amount of cash raised by the
new tax would be offset by cuts to other taxes. The 1997 Kyoto
protocol, which New Zealand expects to ratify this year, requires
developed countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions
by around five percent of 1990 levels on average between the
first commitment period of 2008-12. However, the United States,
the worlds biggest polluter, has refused to ratify the
protocol.
New Zealand produces between 70 million to 90
million tons of carbon dioxide a year, ranking it the fourth
largest per capita producer after the US, Australia, and Canada.
About half of its greenhouse gases come from the methane and
carbon dioxide emissions of more than 50 million sheep and cattle,
from which products earn around one third of New Zealands
export earnings.
Despite the US refusal, New Zealand expects the
agreement to come into force after ratification by the Russian
Federation, probably next year. (Reuters)
Protests at Nevada Test Site yield charges
against 66
Protesters capped a weekend of demonstrations and arrests at
the Nevada Test Site and the planned Yucca Mountain radioactive
waste dump with a rally in Las Vegas claiming minority communities
are disproportionately contaminated by federal nuclear facilities.
Officials said 66 pople were arrested or issued summonses Oct.
11-13, including some who refused to identify themselves and
remained jailed in Nye County until the ACLU of Nevada intervened.
About 24 black, Hispanic, and American Indian demonstrators
claimed increased rates of cancer, birth defects, and skin disorders
in minority communities near nuclear facilities in South Carolina,
Washington, New Mexico, and Nevada and a chemical plant in Mississippi.
Protests and rallies are common at the gate to the test site,
about 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas.
Most of the 66 men and women were issued trespassing summonses
at the gates to the test site.
The National Nuclear Security Administration, a branch of the
Energy Department, operates the test site, where 928 full-scale
nuclear weapons tests were conducted from 1951 to 1992. (SFGate.com)
Kilimanjaros ice fields are melting
Once described by author Ernest Hemingway to be as wide
as all the world, the ice fields atop Mount Kilmanjaro
have now retreated to their lowest surface extent in the past
12,000 years and could vanish within the next two decades, new
research suggests.
The findings, based on the first ever climate history of Africa
using ice core analysis, are all the more troubling, scientists
say, because these glaciers provide one of the few archives
of historical climate change in the tropics, where long ice
core records are rare.
The white peak of Kilmanjaro, which at 5,895 meters is the
highest point in Africa, has long been one of the continents
most recognizable landmarks. However, over the last two years,
research has indicated that
Kilmanjaros glaciers are retreating at an unprecedented
rate, shrinking by almost 80 percent since 1912. Now new findings
published Oct. 17 in the journal Science indicate
the glaciers are melting at a rate of about one-half meter per
year, supporting previous predictions that, if current climate
conditions continue, the ice caps will vanish by 2020. (ENS)
US thirst for oil threatens Canada
US demand for fossil fuels is destroying Canadian air, land,
and water resources, according to a new report released by two
environmental groups.
The US-based Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and the
Sierra Club of Canada say oil and gas production in Canada,
driven by demand in the US, is threatening huge swaths of Canadian
wilderness and marine areas, increasing greenhouse gas emissions,
and exposing millions of Canadians in rural areas to dangerous
air emissions.
The oil and gas industrys activities are legal under
Canadian law, and are encouraged by government subsidies, the
groups add.
The report, Americas Gas Tank: The High Cost of
Canadas Oil and Gas Export Strategy, shows that
Canada, not Saudi Arabia, is the single largest supplier of
oil and gas to the United States. Over the past decade, Canadian
oil production has increased by about 50 percent, and gas production
by more than two-thirds.
Today, about 60 percent of Canadian oil and gas is exported
to the US market.
NRDC and the Sierra Club released their report in the middle
of a heated debate in Canada on ratifying the international
Kyoto agreement to reduce greenhouse gasses.
The report calls for Canada to adopt renewable energy sources,
protect wilderness areas from fossil fuel exploitation, and
pass tougher laws to limit pollution from the oil and gas industry.
The Canadian oil and gas industry has bankrolled a public relations
campaign to reject Kyoto in favor of what it is calling a Made
in Canada solution that would contain no greenhouse gas
reduction targets. (ENS)
|