Wal-Mart loses in variance
request
By Wendy Hounsel
At last Tuesday’s city council meeting, citizens
of Asheville triumphed over proponents of the proposed Super
Wal-Mart development at the Sayles Bleachery site in east Asheville.
In a decision which surprised and overjoyed many of the activists
and concerned citizens present, two of the five city council
members voted not to grant an exception to river protection
rules for JDN Development, the company spearheading the project.
Subsequently, the variance that the company requested was denied.
In order to break ground for the 63-acre sprawl,
JDN needed a variance to existing guidelines now protecting
the River Resource Yard, a large part of the Swananoa river
bank along the Sayles site which extends 50 feet from the river.
The variance would have allowed the developer to disturb the
area considerably by building two bridges. According to Deborah
McKenna of the North Carolina Clean Water Fund, 53% of the River
Resource Yard was slated to be destroyed, although developers
pledged to revegetate the area after construction was complete.
They would not, however, have been able to replace a stand of
mature oak trees slated for destruction.
The legal question at hand was not, “Should there
be a Wal-Mart at Sayles?” but rather, “Do current guidelines
create an unnecessary hardship for the developer?” Despite this
technicality, it was plain that the citizens present saw the
granting of the variance for what it was: a green light for
the influx of increased traffic, water and noise pollution,
flooding, erosion, and a reduced quality of life for residents
of surrounding areas, quite possibly for all of Asheville. Public
disapproval of the development was made plain when chairman
Daryl Hart asked for a show of hands regarding the issue. The
only hands raised in support were those of the vice president
of JDN, JDN’s attorney, the two property owners, and an engineer/hydrologist
hired by the company. The rest of the audience — over 100 people
– raised their hands in opposition.
Ignoring the public outcry, the proponents presented
their case. While professing the desire to handle the development
in an ecologically sound way, they argued that their proposal
was the only “economically feasible” alternative found for the
site through “five years of actively searching,” according to
property owner Harley Dunn. Thus, they reasoned, a variance
was necessary for the property owners to avoid “economic hardship.”
Jim Siemens, attorney for the nearby Beverly Hills
neighborhood association, disagreed. He cited the owners’ leasing
of warehouse space in Riverbend Business Park, located on the
property, as evidence that the owners are already making money
on the site, albeit a small amount, and thus have no legal right
to a variance. “If the owner is breaking even, he can’t have
a variance. That’s the law,” said Siemens, referring to a statement
made earlier in the meeting by Dunn.
At the end of the four hour meeting, three of
the council members seemed to be convinced of JDN’s need for
a variance. Chairman Hart even brought up the idea that perhaps
a new Wal-Mart Supercenter would constitute “enhancement” of
the city. However, the guidelines for granting a variance state
that it must be for the absolute minimum needed to get the job
done. The remaining two members, Laura Malinoff and Dennis Hodgson,
were not convinced that JDN’s plan did indeed constitute the
minimum necessary for the property owners to make a “reasonable
return” on the property, and that it would cause the least possible
amount of damage to the River Resource Yard. The two voted against
granting the variance, much to the surprise and relief of the
Wal-Mart opponents.
JDN can still appeal to the Buncombe County Superior
Court, resubmit its plan after a waiting period, drastically
revise its plan, or drop the project altogether. But because
of the amount of money the developers say they have spent on
the now defeated plan, and the fact that there are already plans
for another new Wal-Mart on Gerber Road in South Asheville,
the possibilities of the developer’s making revisions, resubmitting
after the waiting period, or appealing to a higher court seem
small. The residents near the Sayles site hope that this denial
has effectively shut the door on a Wal-Mart at the site.
Although the proposal was backed by wealthy supporters,
the fact that it was defeated sends an important message: those
who seek profit through the disregard and exploitation of people
and the environment do not always succeed. Sometimes the people
win, and this, apparently, was one of those times.
Charlotte calls for execution
moratorium
Statement of People of Faith Against the Death
Penalty
Charlotte, North Carolina, Sept. 5— After
14 months of meeting twice a month, conducting public education
forums, and building local support, members of the Charlotte
Coalition for a Moratorium Now and People of Faith Against the
Death Penalty watched their city council override their mayor’s
veto with an 8-3 vote and pass a resolution calling for a moratorium
on executions.
“It’s hard to even imagine it’s happened,” said
Ted Frazer, chair of the Charlotte Coalition. “It’s been a long
process, but I would have never guessed at all the energy and
all the people who came out.”
More than 150 people attended the city council
meeting Tuesday tonight, almost all wearing “Moratorium Now”
stickers.
During public testimony, four Charlotte residents
spoke against the resolution, including a local minister and
the leader of the local branch of the Fraternal Order of Police.
James Ferguson, III spoke briefly to the council in favor of
the resolution, saying he had never been prouder of the city
council as when it voted for the resolution exactly one week
earlier.
Mayor Patrick McCrory, whose veto of the resolution
needed seven votes to be overridden, read descriptions of each
of the murders committed by 10 death row inmates from Charlotte
in the past decade. “We’re telling the citizens of our city
that we want to delay their executions,” he said.
Republican city council member Ron Autrey said,
“I believe every one of them should be executed.” But, he said,
he supports the moratorium resolution because the justice system
serves those defendants with enough money to protect themselves
against the death penalty while poor defendants are given death.
“I believe justice must be as blind as we can
make it,” Autrey said, “And resources shouldn’t make a difference.”
As part of the NC Moratorium Now campaign organized
by People of Faith Against the Death Penalty, more than 70 resolutions
calling for a moratorium on executions in North Carolina have
been passed so far by congregations, community groups, businesses,
and the governments of Carrboro, Chapel Hill, Charlotte, Davidson,
Durham, Hillsborough, and Orange County.
For more information: PFADP: 919-933-7567
Activists work to stop Taylor’s
I-MAX
Statement of ParkWatch
Environmental activists in western North Carolina
are organizing to defeat Charles Taylor’s proposed I-MAX theater
development adjacent to the the Blue Ridge Parkway. ParkWatch
is pleased to provide leadership in organizing resistance to
this wholly inappropriate and wasteful 4-story addition to our
Parkway. Taylor’s huge I-MAX Theater joins his bigger plan to
build an Economic Development Center next to the new Parkway
Headquarters. Both are part of a campaign gimmick called his
“Magnet Triangle Plan,” resurrected each election cycle since
he introduced it at the Asheville Chamber of Commerce in 1994.
His plan transforms public land to serve private commercial
enterprise.
No federal agency ever requested Taylor’s Triangle
Plan, nor has he introduced it to Congress. Not once during
these 6 years did Taylor ask Parkway users if they wanted his
towering I-MAX Theater overwhelming their Parkway. He builds
support covertly within regional Industrial Tourism forces,
exclusively among those who will profit from it — who are also
among his political and financial supporters.
Now is the time to stop this monstrosity from
being built, before funds are appropriated. In 1999, ParkWatch
led a national campaign which stopped $5 million in federal
and state funds from being appropriated. This is only a down
payment on the massive I-MAX /Economic Development Center, which
will cost taxpayers at least $10 million— a cost hidden from
the public by piecemealing appropriations over several annual
budgets to obscure total costs.
Here’s the danger for those who love the Parkway
the way it is: according to paid research, Taylor’s I-MAX will
attract over 600,000 visitors annually to the most heavily traveled
five miles, already used by local residents as their Asheville
Bypass. Look for Taylor’s I-MAX to cause this section of our
Parkway to be 4-laned.
Taylor has thrown down the gauntlet, and made
the I-MAX a center piece of his November re-election strategy.
He’s turned Election 2000 into a referendum on the Parkway’s
future: a vote for Taylor means you are in favor of building
a 4-story I-MAX Theatre on the Blue Ridge Parkway. This November’s
election will be your best and probably only opportunity to
have your voice heard effectively. Speak now, or forever regret
your silence.
For more information: parkwatch@earthlink.net
Selling spirituality – confrontation
with the Bear Tribe
Editor’s note: the following is a first-person
account from a participant in the event.
BJ McManama
Protesters gather at the site of the Bear
Tribe workshop
Old Fort, North Carolina, Sept. 8-- On
Friday, a group of represen-tatives from Earth First, the American
Indian Movement (AIM), and the Asheville Leonard Peltier Support
Group (LPSG), gathered at the Curtis Creek Campgrounds near
Old Fort, NC. The objective for the weekend was to confront
the people calling themselves the Bear Tribe Medicine Society
and to demand they stop selling “Native” teachings and let them
know their activities are being watched.
For those that aren’t familiar with the Bear Tribe,
their founders and members have operated around the country
and other parts of the world for more than 15 years and for
almost that long have been asked by traditional Indian people
to ‘cease and desist’ with these activities. They advertise
weekends filled with American Indian teachings and sacred ceremonies
for a high-price to people who are seeking this kind of experience.
Unfortunately, this is not what they get for their money. In
truth, the “students” of the Bear Tribe receive convoluted teachings
by a group of mostly non-Indian people falsely claiming heritage
and knowledge taught to them by traditional holy men and women.
These weekends and workshops are a very lucrative
business for them and they have continued their activities until
they’re driven out of an area by minimal participation or too
much opposition from local traditional people. And their actions
at the “meeting” we had with them told us they care no more
for those they sell these teachings to than WalMart and other
multinational corporations care what they do to the environment,
third world countries, and our people’s land, health, ancient
settlements, and burial grounds. Money is the bottom line.
During the month of August information about
the Bear Tribe gathering, the location, and email address of
Camp Grier was circulated throughout Indian country and many
people sent in their thoughts and opinions to the director and
his staff. About two weeks before the event was to take place
I made a call to Camp Grier in Old Fort and was connected to
the Reverend Shaw, director of the facility. I introduced myself
and at first he was a little reluctant to talk with me because
some of the letters and thoughts sent to him were harsh. However,
after I explained that the comments came from years of fighting
these people and their activities, and pointed out the damage
caused by selling ceremony and false knowledge he became very
open and supportive. During the course of our discussion he
invited us to come to the camp and “air our differences” with
these people. And when it came time to do this he was a man
of his word and honored his invitation.
When we confronted Wind Daughter and another representative
of the Bear Tribe at the entrance to Camp Grier on Saturday
afternoon with our request to stop the sale of ceremony and
teachings they were combative. They denied charging for ceremony
and told us, “They didn’t make any money.” And that “the ceremonies
were free!” Of course we knew different and once they realized
we came prepared with the truth they backed down with some of
the denials. However, they continued to argue and gave us all
of the rhetoric we have heard for years by them and others selling
ceremony. They told us that there was no other way for people
to receive these teachings and they were doing a “service” to
those that came to them to “learn.” There was four of our group
that spoke to them briefly and directly – and they argued every
point we made but their words were feeble compared to the truth
of their actions. But our message was clear – the campaign to
educate the people would go on until they had no more “customers.”
We also requested to speak to the people there
but they refused. They also refused to give them information
booklets we had prepared. However, on Sunday afternoon, three
members of our group went back to Camp Grier and handed out
these booklets to the people as they drove out of the facility.
These booklets contain information concerning the issues that
American Indian people face today. These issues are - the continued
genocide of our culture and people - the removal of the Dineh
and Hopi of Big Mountain by Peabody Coal - the continued incarceration
of Leonard Peltier, and Eddie Hatcher - the life and still unsolved
murder of Anna Mae - a list “unsolved” murders or suspicious
deaths of Indian people on Pine Ridge and surrounding Indian
country from 1973 to the present – and the Lakota Declaration
of War and Solidarity against the “plastic medicine men” and
“wannabe” tribes springing up all over the country. Also included
was a list of authors and titles of Indian culture, history,
and spirituality where those wanting to learn can acquire some
of the knowledge they seek, as well as a list of authors to
avoid. The bottom line was and is – “If you want to Be Indian,
then LIVE Indian, and “living” Indian is not just spiritual
weekends – it is taking responsibility for ourselves and our
actions. It is caring for Mother Earth and living our lives
with the next seven generations in mind.
And as the members of our group handed out this
information it was revealed by the people leaving the camp that
some of the Bear Tribe had gone back and told the participants
that “the people wanting to shut them down were all around them
in the woods.” And, “They are armed.” One person even claimed
seeing a laser tracer in the trees - more evidence of their
need to “demonize” us in order to cover up the truth. Someone
from the Bear Tribe even called local law enforcement on Sunday
to have our people removed. At that time Rev. Shaw made it clear
to police that there were no threats made by our group, told
them our people had permission to be there, and the police left
without incident.
Some of the people coming out of the camp also
shared that they were “disappointed” with what went on during
the weekend and were receptive and accepted the information
offered gratefully. Rev. Shaw told us that the Bear Tribe will
not be allowed to return to their camp again. Everyone from
Earth First, the Asheville LPSG, and AIM were instrumental in
making this a peaceful and successful confrontation. We would
like to thank Rev. Shaw for his interest and concern, and for
his integrity and honesty. He found himself in an awkward situation
and he acted with dignity and honor.
If you would like more information regarding Indian
issues, a copy of our booklet, or to lend your support in the
effort to free Leonard Peltier please call 232-0951 or email
ThePeoplesVoice@hotmail.com.
Black activists urge boycott
of Chattanooga, Tennessee
Chattanooga, Tennessee, Sept. 11— Charging
that since 1980, over 40 people, most of whom were black, have
been murdered by the city’s “reckless, ruthless and racist”
police, a group of black activists has called for a tourist
boycott of Chattanooga, Tenn.
In a related development, three black activists
will go on trial Sept. 12 for protesting against police brutality
at a meeting of the Chattanooga City Council in 1998. Lorenzo
Komboa Ervin, co-organizer of Boycott Chattanooga!, Damon McGee
and Mikail Musa Muhammad (Ralph P. Mitchell) are charged with
disruption, a misdemeanor offense that outlaws making a verbal
utterance or a physical action that disrupts a lawful meeting.
If convicted, they face up to a year in state prison.
Chattanooga is located near the scenic Great Smoky
Mountain National Park. “The lifeblood of Chattanooga’s economy
is the tourist industry, which brings in millions of dollars
each year,” Ervin said. “This money helps to make it possible
for the uniformed assassins of the police department to get
away with murder.”
Ervin urged tourist agents to “tell their customers
not to trade with killers.”
Despite overwhelming evidence that the police
killings were not suicides or accidents, as the police claim,
no police officers have ever been prosecuted. For the past 15
years, an average of one person a month has been killed by the
Chattanooga police, Ervin said.
One of the victims was Wadie Suttles, a 66-year-old
black man who died at the city jail on Dec. 2, 1983. Maxine
Cousins, a daughter of Suttles and co-organizer of Boycott Chattanooga!,
said that her father was beaten to death by a police officer
at the jail. “It was cold-blooded murder,” Cousins said. She
and Ervin have accused some of the city’s civil rights groups
of conspiring with police to cover up Suttles’ murder.
After her father’s death, Cousins co-founded the
now defunct civil rights group, Concerned Citizens for Justice.
In 1987, the group, in which Ervin was active, filed a federal
voting rights lawsuit that resulted in the restructuring of
the city government and the creation of the Chattanooga City
Council in 1990. The first blacks were elected to city government
since 1911.
The case against Ervin, McGee and Muhammad, who
are known as the “Chattanooga 3,” dates back to May 19, 1998.
On that day, the three activists helped to organize a demonstration
at Chattanooga City Hall where over 150 people protested the
police killings of Montrail Collins on April 28 and Kevin McCullough
on May 6, 1998.
Source: Direct Action Media Network: damn@tao.ca
|